Limited version - please login or register to view the entire paper.
determination of a deputy
Determination of a Deputy
Local Office No. 510
Deputy No. 173
Claimant: Paul Micaletti
S.S.N.: 163-40-6709
On Nov. 10th. 2003 I filed an appeal against a Determination of Deputy. Since I filed, I found further information that supports my reasoning for appealing I’m appealing D.E.S’s explanation of the wages used to qualify for unemployment insurance. At the bottom of the determination I received, the deputy stated the wages used are wages that were paid, not earned earned in the claimant’s base period. But in reading the pamphlet, A Guide To Arizona Benefits,( which I received from D.E.S. and was required to sign a paper cert...
Determination of a Deputy
Local Office No. 510
Deputy No. 173
Claimant: Paul Micaletti
S.S.N.: 163-40-6709
On Nov. 10th. 2003 I filed an appeal against a Determination of Deputy. Since I filed, I found further information that supports my reasoning for appealing I’m appealing D.E.S’s explanation of the wages used to qualify for unemployment insurance. At the bottom of the determination I received, the deputy stated the wages used are wages that were paid, not earned earned in the claimant’s base period. But in reading the pamphlet, A Guide To Arizona Benefits,( which I received from D.E.S. and was required to sign a paper cert...
Posted by: Tricia F. Doyle
Limited version - please login or register to view the entire paper.