Back to category: Miscellaneous Limited version - please login or register to view the entire paper. Crirtically compare two different arguments for being a vegetarian , derivedfrom any two of the following : Kant, Utilitarianism, Animal Rights or Virtue Ethics. The focus of this essay,is to critically d I will present the argument from animal rights base on Tom Regan’s article ‘The case for animal rights’, and then move on to present the argument from Utilitarianism base on Peter Singer’s argument on ‘All animals are equal’. The second part of this essay I will try to evaluate and critically discuss both arguments in a more precise valuation. The treatment of non human especially animals has not traditionally been regarded as a moral issue. Christian philosophers such as St Thomas Aquinas argue that man alone is made in God’s image and that mere animals do not have souls nor moral categories , strictly speaking we as human being are free to treat them in any way for our own advantage such as eating their flesh, human resource….etc. Henceforth, eating meat has been rooted in human beings and somehow planted into their lifestyle as a essential sort of iron, benefits for human body development. As a re... Posted by: Ryan Wilkins Limited version - please login or register to view the entire paper. |
|
© 2006 TermPaperAccess.com |