Back to category: Religion

Limited version - please login or register to view the entire paper.

THE JURY MIGHT BE OUT, BUT THERE IS ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO CONVICT

THE JURY MIGHT BE OUT, BUT THERE IS ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO CONVICT

In the “rational” 20th century, many people truly believed that christianity had been proved inaccurate by science. Certainly, there have been those in that field who have consistently tried to portray that as the case, but, on the other hand, there are many across the scientific community who are proud to call themselves Christians. In the 21st century, rationalism is still part of the scene, but there is an increasing number of people for whom evidence, even if there should be some to support Christianity, is irrelevant. We can call these people “neo-rationalists” or even “relativists.” Their belief is that there is truth in all creeds and whatever you believe is okay.
So who is correct? Is Christianity out of date, or doesn’t it indeed matter?
The truth is: it does indeed matter if Christianity is wrong, or inacurate, or based upon false premises. If it is wrong historically, says the Apostle Paul, th...

Posted by: Sheryl Hogges

Limited version - please login or register to view the entire paper.