Back to category: Politics

Limited version - please login or register to view the entire paper.

Stollery vs R

Part 2

a. In which court was the case conducted?
The case was conducted in the High Court of Australia.

b. What was Stollery trying to achieve?
Mr Stollery was trying to overturn a decision made by the Supreme
Court of New South Wales.

c. What was the basis of Stollery’s case?
The basis of Stollery’s case was that justice was not observed. He claimed that the presence of and unqualified member during the Board decision made the decision void. The Supreme Court of New South Wales was in the opinion that it was.

d. What power did the Greyhound Board rely on?
The power that the Greyhound Board relied on was that they had the right to refuse an application for renewal if made after the previous registration had expired.

e. In two ...

Posted by: Chad Boger

Limited version - please login or register to view the entire paper.