HAMLET Critique

Henri Suhamy expresses positively that the dilapidated imagery portrayed in Hamlet brings forth many explications. Some of the explications are paradoxical in form when criticizing Hamlet. Suhamy reinterprets theories and criticism by comparing many great critics and their opinions with Metaphorical Fallacy.
Overexploited sin and crime, in terms of disease and rottenness, is interpreted as Metaphorical Fallacy. Suhamy says that this type of imagery shines light on the inner meaning and technicalities of language. It also shines upon a reflection of ethical morals of a deep religious community. In the case of a play, the fallacy clearly defines understood thoughts about a variety of characters within the play. Sometimes, opinions are very misleading lead to misinterpretations.
Suhamy interprets one of the main theories, introduced by Morris Weitz, author of Hamlet and the Philosophy of Literary Criticism. In Weitz’s book (Hamlet and the Philosophy of Literary Criticism)...