Back to category: Miscellaneous Limited version - please login or register to view the entire paper. Case Analysis - Kuzmica v. Ivy Hill Park Apartments Case Brief Analysis Kuzmicz v. Ivy Hill Park Apartments, Inc. Richard R. Hall Legal Environment of Business Law 529 P. Croushore, JD, LLM March 23, 2003 Case Brief Kuzmicz v. Ivy Hill Park Apartments, Inc., 147 N.J. 510 (N.J. Sup.Ct. 1997) Plaintiff and Defendant The plaintiff is Ireneusz Kuzmicz. The defendants are Ivy Hill Park Apartments, Inc., Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, and the Newark Board of Education. Facts Mr. Kuzmicz was assaulted on vacant land owned by Newark Board of Education (Board). The lot is located between Ivy Hill Park Apartments and a grocery store owned by Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company (A&P). An opening in the fence allows a person to use the Board’s property as a short cut to the grocery store. The issue is do Ivy Hill Apartments and A&P owe Mr. Kuzmicz a duty to protect him from the risk of assault on the Board’s property by warning him of the risk of off-premises criminal assaults or by fixing the opening in ... Posted by: Shelia Olander Limited version - please login or register to view the entire paper. |
|
© 2006 TermPaperAccess.com |